In law, "maybe" is not a strategy.
Mrs. Prunella Bramble, a retired taxidermist with a fondness for peacock feathers, claimed that her neighbor, Mr. Otis Hopple, had erected a fence that violated the town’s ancient boundary accord—specifically, a clause concerning “the path of the noonday shadow.” Mr. Hopple, a beekeeper whose bees had grown as irritable as he had, argued that the shadow clause was null and void because the oak tree that cast it had been struck by lightning in ’82. lomp court case
: A historic case where the court examined actions involving a glove compartment and a physical altercation to determine legal liability and verisimilitude in reporting. In law, "maybe" is not a strategy
The case before Judge Armitage Shanks (a name he bore with tragic dignity) was Bramble v. Hopple . On the surface, it was about a fence. Beneath it, it was about everything. Otis Hopple, had erected a fence that violated
In the eyes of the court, a "maybe" is a loss. Medical certainty is the only path to a win. Always ensure your medical experts know the difference!
: In this major patent dispute, the court specifically addressed the admissibility of Dr. Lomp’s expert opinions. The court declined to exclude his benefits opinions, noting he provided an adequate basis for his methodology, though it reserved the right to re-evaluate his testimony at trial.
